I have been thinking if it’s too late to drop my thoughts but I have come to the conclusion that this post is timeless and should perhaps be pin somewhere we can revisit often. that said, let’s take a dive…


Value Capture with the Bankless Brand!
Traditionally, in terms of revenue generation and monetary value accrual, I would say that BanklessHQ has monopolize that front. Since we produce content that covers the same space in similar fashion, hardcore sponsors would rather give HQ their advertising money than projects from the DAO. The creation of bDAO created an open & competitive market for Bankless media monetization.
bDAO Podcasts suffers to generate sponsorships-> HQ podcasts
bDAO Newsletters/publishing struggle to get sponsorship → HQ newsletter/publication(btw, recently crossed 300K on substack🤯)
Let’s assume you are a potential sponsor looking to throw some dough to get max returns/exposure, which project/entity within the Bankless Ecosystem would you give your money to? I would bet on HQ in this case.
I believe core projects champions on the forefront of content production will know how people reach out and say Bankless, but they mean BanklessHQ when it comes to money matters, mostly.
It’s been quite unsuccessful on the traditional sponsorship front. On the web3 front, we have had little success with some DAO and web3 projects sponsoring a couple of the media projects. But it keeps getting more and more difficult to secure new or keep sponsors.
So it’s safe to say, BanklessHQ has captured the traditional sponsorhsip/monetary value accrual front in the Bankless ecosystem. if there’s was marketcap table, HQ will have a big chunk of the pie. And to be honest, they deserve all that and more. they are wonderful folks.

So to accrue monetary value to the DAO, web3 is the wei - I can bet my last gwei - Here are some thoughts!

Projects are bDAOs goldmine!
Create a project graduation ceremony - this could use a better name:joy:
There’s a reason why DAOpunk has been the project with the most revenue to the DAO. I remember like it was yesterday, the rally the entire community had behind that project was phenomenal. these days, it’s not like that. Projects champions are basically left to their fate with the DAO(GC) on their tales about revenue. sheesh, tough time to be a project champ!
TLDR
→ Bootstrap project graduators. just like the way we have GC. Let’s spin a group and fund them well!
When projects pass MVP and grow to a sustainable level, Project graduators job would be to help those project scale to the next level. through tokenisation(mostly NFT first).
→ The main focus would be to rally the bDAO community, affiliate communities, HQ and it’s influence behind these projects.
→ When done well, this could potentially unlock huge value to the DAO, financially. DAOpunk is a case study.
→ Not all candidates will have the same class(success), but we sure will be graduating lots of impact projects.
Good in branding, Bad in funding! → Ecosystem funding and public good funding
When it comes to pure, unadulterated impact😂, some bDAO projects rank very high. Per public good funding criteria and principles, these projects should be added to a lot of the public goods funding rounds happening in the crypto ecosystem. unfortunately, due to brand confusion, they aren’t getting added. tbh, it’s a huge loss to the DAO imo.
So what do? I am of the opinion that projects should take a look at their branding.
Share the same root - but assume individual traits/brand.
One of the best ways the DAO is getting revenue is through projects getting outside funds and sharing a portion with the DAO. there’s a rise in public goods funding and it will continue to get bigger, if we want to accrue value to the DAO, we need to figure out a way for high impact projects from bDAO ecosystem to participate because in all principle and criteria, they more than qualify to participate.
some thoughts
→ Some projects should perhaps rebrand and update the Bankless name attached to them. for e.g, localize the name, what does Bankless mean in spanish? is there a word or a concept that captures the Bankless way in spanish or in Africa? use that term instead of Bankless.
I believe this could have the ff positive effects.
- contextualize the Bankless term and movement more and makes it more easier for folks to understand and get onboarded.
- removes confusion of people always thinking we are the same.
- Give projects fair chances of getting into public good funding rounds!
The Bankless vision will be realized when the Bankless ethos permeates society at a level where folks are Bankless without knowing they or even the term!

Let’s take what we have built to a chain!
bDAO is not just the biggest mediaDAO in the world, it’s revolution of media. it continues to empower people all over the world to voice out their thought, propagate their truths and share a collective culture of wanting to make a change with the power of crypto! If web3 is the future, bDAO is essentially a key global media/social/coordination layer in this future. So wen bDAO chain? we should spin up an L2 chain! I believe this will scale bDAO itself - maybe more on this later but the chain could basically become crypto’s media/onboarding chain where we fund initiatives to take us to a billion. this might shift the focus from the constant need for revenue to funding initiatives with the chains native token to achieve our goal. it also unlocks many ways to ease onboarding.
Btw, are we for profit? can we be?
Are we a public good, seems that’s how we have predominantly been so far?
if we are a public good, then does it make sense to have a chain? seems like a good idea to me.
In the age of L3s and superchains, global level DAOs will have their own chain to facilitate the achievement of their objectives. and it will be normal. it will be great if we can also start thinking in that direction!