Nice post ser! I support some level of retro funding for newsletters, but don’t think we should being doing any proactive funding at this time. i tend to agree that the rollup helps w/ the transition, and that team should apply for additional retro for future work after the transition is complete. not sure i can say the same for the l2 tho as it’s not related to the transition. considering the funding restart forum post, perhaps only the rollup should be retro funded at this time since it’s the only newsletter that relates to the transition. thanks for helping me to clarify my thinking.