Tokenomics - Stake 10 ETH from Treasury using Rocket Pool

Governance Proposals
1

Title: Stake 10 ETH from Treasury using Rocket Pool

Authors: 0xHunter#3863

Date Created: March 9th, 2022

Date Posted: March 30th, 2022

TLDR

  • Stake 10 ETH from the Bankless treasury with Rocket Pool
    • Generate 4.3% annual yield (potential ~10% after the PoS merge)
    • Support permissionless staked ETH pooling infrastructure
    • Gather data to support staking larger percentage of Bankless treasury ETH in the future

Summary

The proposal is to stake (10 ETH) of our ETH in the treasury (34.45 ETH) for rETH to generate passive yield on ETH and support permissionless, decentralized PoS ETH staking. The reason for starting with a 10 ETH stake is to minimize our initial Rocket Pool protocol risk exposure, and we should stake more after we are more confident in the benefits of staking our ETH with Rocket Pool. rETH is liquid and can be swapped back for ETH at any time if needed.

The future vision that this proposal will aid in proving out is to make holding rETH (or other decentralized ETH PoS pools) the standard for the BanklessDAO treasury using any ETH not set aside for gas. This proposal is our initial foray into this vision.

BACKGROUND

We currently have 34.45 ETH in our treasury that could be passively generating low-risk yield via securing the ETH PoS network using Rocket Pool’s protocol.

Rocket Pool docs: https://docs.rocketpool.net/

MISSION & VALUES ALIGNMENT

This proposal would extend our treasury runway by generating low-risk yield, which would allow BanklessDAO to allocate more funds to support our mission.

This proposal is also highly aligned with BanklessDAO’s commitment to supporting fully permissionless, decentralized systems. Rocket Pool is currently the only fully permissionless, decentralized ETH PoS Staking system. This system allows anyone with less than 32 ETH and anyone willing to maintain a validator to secure the ETH PoS consensus mechanism. In the same way that the Ethereum community has elected to maintain low block size in the PoW consensus mechanism to allow for a higher degree of decentralization, Rocket Pool allows any amount of ETH to be staked, further decentralizing the upcoming PoS consensus mechanism.

Why not Lido?

Lido is not a truly permissionless platform and whitelists validators. This mitigates slashing risk but does not promote true decentralization. Rocket Pool has collateral mechanisms to mitigate slashing effects instead of whitelisting, which is outlined in the specification below.

SCOPE OF WORK

Stake 10 ETH from our treasury for rETH

SPECIFICATION

Yield: Currently, Rocket Pool’s website lists a 4.33% APR, which will decrease slowly as more ETH is staked and potentially jump up to ~9-12% APR (Reference by Justin Drake) after the PoS merge and fees are distributed to PoS validators.

Income generated per season:

10 ETH stake:

  • 0.099 ETH per season pre-merge

  • 0.249 ETH per season post-merge

Future potential of 34.45 ETH stake:

  • 0.345 ETH per season pre-merge

  • 0.861 ETH per season post-merge

Slashing risk: There is a slashing risk losing underlying ETH if the Rocket Pool validators misbehave, but this is heavily insured by the ETH and Rocket Pool token collateral that validators have to put up. And the pooled nature of rETH spreads the risk across all holders (Reference: 🤔 Frequently Asked Questions | Rocket Pool).

Smart contract risk: There is a risk of the Rocket Pool contracts being exploited, although greatly reduced as they have been audited by Sigma Prime and ConsenSys Diligence and have been operational on mainnet since November 9th 2021 and have gone through multiple rounds of beta testing (Reference: 🤔 Frequently Asked Questions | Rocket Pool).

SUCCESS METRICS OR KPIS

Yield: Any yield would be considered a success against our current ETH generating no yield. Slashing and Rocket Pool smart contract exploitation could move our yield below 0%, so we should still consider this a success despite a slashing event or smart contract exploit if our yield stays above 0%.

NEXT STEPS

Stake 10 ETH from our treasury for rETH

DISCORD POLL

Treasury Guild member temp check poll:
Screenshot from 2022-03-30 11-57-33

FORUM POLL

  • Approve
  • Dispute

0 voters

3 Likes
2

I like the idea, just curious why not use 16 ETH to start a new rocket pool node and get more rewards?

6 Likes
3

Like the idea. Ignorant question…can a multisig be used to setup, host, and control a node?

1 Like
4

I really like that idea and definitely considered it! It’s a little more complicated of a proposal because I believes it has to involve someone actually running/maintaining validator hardware and is a little harder to do without a single point of failure for bDAO’s assets being exposed to being slashed.

I think this proposal is a good starting point to dip our toes into Rocket Pool but definitely think we should consider running a node in the future.

3 Likes
5

I I’d imagine you can interact with the Rocket Pool smart contract with a multi-sig as a validator, but I’m not sure you could do that with the actual operation of a node, and there would be a single point of failure with whoever is maintaining the actual validator hardware.

1 Like
6

+1 if we can figure out and start our own pool in a decentralised way, I will stake some ETH there as well. Thanks for the movement here!

3 Likes
7

How about allocating towards icETH instead of rETH?

icETH is a new product from our partners at the Index Coop and earns 3x more staking rewards.

1 Like
8

IcETH was released after I posted this proposal, but I have looked into it a bunch and am tempted to go that direction instead. Deciding whether we should try this slightly less risky proposal first and make a new one with 10 different ETH or resubmit this proposal for icETH.

1 Like
9

Pasting icETH risks here if anyone is curious: Understanding Interest Compounding ETH Index (icETH) | Yield Products | Index Coop

3 Likes
10

Great project, let’s make a fortune together

11

I would second this. Either allocating towards icETH, or setting up our own node seem like good options. Just different pro’s and con’s to explore.

12

I might be the worst degen in the DAO. What i know is the first thing we should be looking for is “risk to return ratio”.

that scared me right away.

I know “high yields” seems like a good deal, but they come with high risk. Crypto offers high yields some times but i don’t think this is realistic. And i think we have seen the worst examples of that in this bear market.

There are reasons for lower returns on interests. In reality (math) more “sound” your money is, less yields you get. Since Ethereum is “ultra sound” yields should be lower, with lesser risk factors.

Looking at the upside,

Down side:
%100 (10 Eth) loss in a day

who is rocketpool anyway? what keeps them floating? how long it will keep them floating?

The risk to return ratio is too damn high! imo.

Being the “ultrasound money advocates”, we should be the ones running a node, or nodes by pooling and working them for ourselves.