Use Treasury Yield to Fund IRL Events

[hirokennelly]

Hi @links,

@links

I put it up on the tlBANK snapshot space because I wanted to move forward and as a tlBANK holder I’m able to post proposals to that space. There’s no requirement for a forum post so I didn’t do one.

I see now that there are a lot of questions around it, and I could reduce those questions via a forum post.

There are a lot of questions around this proposal because there wasn’t really any discussion around it, and it’s novel, at least for our DAO. It def needed a Forum post first.

I have a few more concerns apart from what has been raised by me and others and fwiw I do think you and @Icedcool voting both Yes and No is appropriate. Don’t have to recuse, but you should cancel your vote out while still being able to ship the transaction based on necessary wallet quorum.

Now more questions/comments:

1. I note that the Forum post you dropped to restart funding limited the funding to:

@links

The Multisig will open up retroactive funding requests for current tlBANK holders who minted before Nov 26, 2023 for the following purposes:

• Define the purpose/vision of the DAO.
• Define the membership structure for the DAO.
• Create a new brand for the DAO, if needed.

Based upon this criteria, your use of the tlBANK space for the purposes stated in the Snapshot are improper by the terms of the Forum post you dropped on behalf of the multisig. It’s neither retro funding nor does it have to do with the transition. If anything, it should be done on the BANK Snapshot space after a Forum post and proper discussion per the guidelines in the Constitution.

2. It doesn’t appear that the tlBANK Snapshot you initiated is set to the proper block height and should be taken down on that fact alone. It’s set to 21,093,437 rather than 18,652,139.
   

   

3. Finally, a note to the multisig (@AboveAverageJoe @senad.eth @Rowan @Icedcool @Jengajojo, @0x_Lucas, the seventh being you links), based upon the tlBANK Snapshot Announcement, I’d ask the members to consider taking the Snapshot down as improper for reasons 1 and 2, per the guidelines set in tlBANK Snapshot Announcement, the text of which provides:

@Icedcool

The Multisig will be integrity checking snapshot proposals and votes.

• If anything seems out of order the multisig will invalidate the proposal on the space, and share justification on the forum.

4. I really dislike having to police your Snapshot like this links, but I suppose that’s just the result of moving too fast. IMO there’s action-oriented and then there’s just impatience. All of this seems due to the latter, not the former. Love you brother, please pull the Snapshot down on own and let’s start the discussion we should have had in the first place.