Brand Clarity Between DAO and HQ

Governance Proposals
3

The first thing that speaks to me is that this is now being the foundational arm of banklessHQ. Is that ‘decentralized’?

I understand the reasoning behind this. Due to the missteps in brand management with some of these proposals that have been created.

This solution sounds more like creating a foundation arm of bankless HQ with de facto leaders while calling it a DAO.

This doesn’t sound like it’s sticking to the ethos that I recall from when I initially started here in 2021.

The most important point is that I wish the best in this situation. I do not believe that this is the most accurate answer versus any other avenue

RE: [Proposal] Migration to DAOpunks

But, the fact that this proposal has appeared is important. Even though I personally am not a fan, I am a fan of the effort put into this, and the discussion that begins from it.

2 Likes