- DoinGud was more than grants since it involved the following:
- A dedicated number of seats in DoinGud DAO governance.
- Collaboration on future events (including priority sponsorship tiers at a discount).
- Amplified exposure as a community for good (recognition on website and social media).
- A sizable discount and allow-list access to the DoinGud membership NFT sale upcoming for all BanklessDAO L1+ members.
If we are to question or excuse ourselves for the decisions made in the past, then it reflects poorly on our ability to make decisions, which is what Hiro pointed to earlier and is the crux of the problem.
- Shield voting does not state what category of upgrade it is. You might say its a minor upgrade, I might claim that it is a major upgrade, someone else might claim that it’s just a patch. This is exactly the problem with quorums framed as bDIPs,
- All ‘governance posts’ need to fall into one of the three categories
- We all need to agree on what category anything falls under
- The post then needs to meet that required quorum even though it is never intended to modify the constitution
If that were true, then:
a. Coordinape Incident Report and next steps
b. BanklessDAO - Tokenomics 1.0
are both governance posts and since I consider them as major upgrades, they should receive 63 votes, but I am sure that someone might disagree with me