Answered no to both because GC hasn’t posted any KPIs or progress towards KPIs.
Happy to support performance related incentives, but as it stands no metrics are set up or openly communicated.
Similar reason to the comment by @Icedcool on the OP proposal [Community Vote] Grants/Funding Strategy for S7 - #2 by Icedcool
I see the original proposal as invalid because it doesn’t include success metrics requested by the community.
Failure to supply these should be a breach of GC duty of care as part of mandate (quoted in the proposal itself amongst other things).
Also from OP post
We made this poll to test if the 250K comp for this work is enough or if it should be more. In the past GCs have not been transparent enough with how this bonus would be paid, which is why we suggested KPIs.
This sounds like the OP poll was a test and thus should not be acted upon.