Mad Hatter MGMT Season 5 Proposal

[meme]

Agree,the bot has always been useful, so this is welcome.

[tony_stark]

I spoke to @ernest_of_gaia on this topic and you are right about the improve education on MadHatter. Ernest also pointed to the idea of bDAO members being able to submit feature request, as this will bridge the communication barrier between the members and the development team.

I just learnt about the wenHelp team in charge of this communication, I think this team also needs better exposure.

P.S. Ernest also made the post to spark discussion on the MadHatter topic

[omen]

mad support here!! mad hatter literally my fav bot

[ETrinity007]

This shouldn’t be debatable, The Dao at large needs Mad Hatter and We Know It!!! Great project

[omen]

yeah exactly, actually a crucial and highly memorable part of the dao

[GCal]

Appreciate the time and effort that went into this proposal. My curiosity is around the PM role and how it integrates with the PM Guild. If the PM isn’t sourced from there and there isn’t an application process how can we create alignment in the practices to be followed.

[SpiritedF]

Mad Hatter is a wonderful project, I support the development. It is a useful tool in bdao.

[innov8tor3]

@nonsensetwice

Opening up Squad Up to allow Level 1 members to quickly bootstrap projects

To save on development work, I suggest Crew 3 provides superb features, and could be adapted to take account of squad building needs.

For me it is step two on the ideation process, so I’ll happily get involved, I want to work on this anyway.

My plan is to build all of the following on distinct Crew 3 modules, I’d love to join a crew on this.

Ideas Team Building Proposal Project Product Data Analytics Sustainability Growth Strategy

[innov8tor3]

I would be happy to support this fully if the Guest Pass aspect is reviewed entirely.

Guest Pass labelling is wildly misused, because there’s no distinction between folk who have been through onboarding and folk who haven’t.

Bank account balance is not the way to tell.

My own proposal needs more work, but suggests that GP needs rather more thought than this.

Announcement Opt In Labels

I would like to propose that bDAO announcements can be targeted rather more accurately. Example Table of Tags for Folk to Choose Here is a table showing what folk may want to opt in to, rather than the rather arbitrary GP, L1 & L2 tags bDAO uses for the interim: DAO Orientation - Welcome Crew - Guild Orientation - Guild Selection - as now Project Orientation - Project Selection - as now Making Contributions - Contributors - Earning Bounties -…

[kravi]

@innov8tor3

Guest Pass labelling is wildly misused, because there’s no distinction between folk who have been through onboarding and folk who haven’t.

Could you elaborate.

[innov8tor3]

@kravi

Could you elaborate

Folk use the tags Guest Pass to notify folk they think still need onboarding, when many have already been onboarded.

I don’t want to get loads of notices through for things I don’t need and / or have already done.

As a media DAO, we can do much better on targeting messages, seeking opt in options, rather than second guessing folks interests based on their bank levels.

I also think there needs to be an L1 club, or thread, for new L1s to decide what to do next. I qualified, and then hit a vacuum.

And I’m not sure I want L2 because of the admin looking after Guest Passes, it’s a disincentive for me. Hence my strong feeling there are better ways to manage onboarding in bDAO.

This lack of attention from bDAO must surely be a factor as to why interest wanes for some L1/L2.

@links @LiviuC

You’ve been very helpful or offered, I’d like if nothing else to simply register my feelings on this, and any action that can be suggested or taken will be a real bonus.